- Introduction
- 1 slides
- Methodology Overview (2 podcasts)
- Controlled Experiments
- 4 slides | mp3 | in-class-slides
- 5 slides | mp3 | in-class notes
- 6 slides | mp3 | in-class notes | At the end of this, these two joke pages should be funny 1 2 - Real life example of interaction effect
- 7 & 8 R project | pdf (keep this under your pillow) | html (use this in class to copy and paste) | in-class notes
- Exercises in R pdf | html
- Keyboard Experiment
- Ethics - slides | mp3
- Facebook Study Readings CPSC681F2014FacebookStudy
- Critique on Standard HCI practice
As a bit of context, both the Dourish and the Greenberg & Buxton papers are commentary on the CHI community, and its emphasis on evaluation. Is it always the case that we need evaluations? Is it appropriate? Dragicevic et al. provide an interesting look into how stats work, and this should be familiar given our explorations with R.
- Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 541-550. DOI=10.1145/1124772.1124855 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855
- Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111-120. DOI=10.1145/1357054.1357074 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357074
- Pierre Dragicevic, Fanny Chevalier, and Stephane Huot. 2014. Running an HCI experiment in multiple parallel universes. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 607-618. DOI=10.1145/2559206.2578881 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2559206.2578881 (Pierre's website on stats; open reviews)
Topic Materials
| Team | Topic | Link | Date |